A Delhi court on Tuesday slammed Delhi Police for failing to show any evidence against Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad, observing that people are out on the streets because things which should have been said inside Parliament were not said.
'As If Jama Masjid Was In Pakistan': Delhi Court Slams Police On Chandrashekhar Azad’s Arrest
"You are behaving as if Jama Masjid was Pakistan and even if it was Pakistan, you can go there and protest. Pakistan was a part of undivided India," the court said.
'As If Jama Masjid Was In Pakistan': Delhi Court Slams Police On Chandrashekhar Azad’s Arrest
'As If Jama Masjid Was In Pakistan': Delhi Court Slams Police On Chandrashekhar Azad’s Arrest
Delhi Police was behaving as if Jama Masjid was Pakistan, Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau said, adding that even if it was, one can protest there peacefully.
The court's remarks came while hearing bail plea of Azad, who was arrested in a case related to anti-CAA protests in old Delhi's Daryaganj area.
"Inside the Parliament, things which should have been said, were not said and that is why people are out on the streets. We have full right to express our views but we cannot destroy our country.
"You are behaving as if Jama Masjid was Pakistan and even if it was Pakistan, you can go there and protest. Pakistan was a part of undivided India," news agency PTI quoted the judge as saying.
The court asked the investigating officer of the police to put on record all the evidence which showed that Azad was allegedly giving incriminatory speeches at the gathering at Jama Masjid and any law which showed that the gathering there was unconstitutional.
The court has put up the matter for further hearing on Wednesday and has asked the state to produce FIRs registered against Bhim Army chief in Saharanpur.
During the hearing, police told the court they have only drone images of the gathering as evidence and no other recording.
To this, the judge said, "Do you think Delhi police is so backward that it has no tools to record anything?
"Show me anything or any law that prohibits such gathering... Where is the violence? Who says you cannot protest...have you read the Constitution? It is one's Constitutional right to protest."
The court further observed that Azad, having a law degree, can also protest inside the courts.
It noted that Azad's Ambedkarite philosophy probably required more research.
"Azad is probably an Ambedkarite. Ambedkar was more closer to the Muslims, Sikhs and basically the repressed class of the society... He was a rebel of his own kind. Probably Azad has a vague idea of what he wants to say but probably not able to put it across. If you take up an issue, you do your research.? And that is missing, " the court said.
The plea, filed through advocate Mehmood Pracha, claimed that there was no evidence against the allegations made against Azad in the FIR and his arrest was illegal.
Azad's outfit had called for a protest march from Jama Masjid to Jantar Mantar against the amended Citizenship Act on December 20, without police permission.
Other 15 people arrested in the case were granted bail by the court on January 9.
(With inputs from PTI and ANI)
-
Previous Story
Uniform Civil Code 'Unacceptable', 'Discriminatory': All India Muslim Personal Law Board Rejects UCC -
Next Story
Air India Cabin Crew Member Attacked Inside London Hotel At Midnight
